There are rumors that Wal-Mart still wants to build near Oak and Orchard. But nothing has been made public yet. I will keep everyone posted.
However, there was an article in the Kane County Chronicle on a recent development west of Oak and Orchard that I thought might interest you. Sorrentino, the developer who wanted Wal-Mart to build on the northeast corner, is moving forward with a nice development for our community. It sounds like he listened to what some of you asked for. If only he could continue our vision to the northeast corner of Oak and Orchard.
Here is the article. Orchard Commons Work To Begin
Thursday, December 20, 2007
Friday, December 7, 2007
Industrial Development at Mitchell & 88
The Village is admirably indefatigable in their efforts to bring business to our town. This seems like a good project; what do you all think?
Industrial buildings slated for N. Aurora
By JONATHAN BILYK
NORTH AURORA – After nearly filling their industrial park on Aurora’s far
west side, a development group is looking to duplicate their success just across
the street.Early next year, Liberty Property Trust will begin work on its latest
development, the Liberty Business Center North Aurora.Planned for about 120
acres at the northwest corner of Interstate 88 and Mitchell Road, the new
industrial park will add three new industrial buildings to North Aurora’s
building stock.
Sunday, July 1, 2007
Response To Kane County Chronicle Columnist Eric Schelkopf's Negative & Biased Interpretation of the Facts
The members of North Aurora Together, and thousands of North Aurorans with them, faced a millionaire developer and a billionaire retailer and, through our sweat and reason, we won. What is more “free market” than that? Kane County Chronicle columnist Eric Schelkopf’s seems against anybody that would dare keep an eye on their elected officials and refuse to be a subject, rather than a citizen.
We believe in America and the American system of free enterprise and property rights. We believe in North Aurora as a community, as a hometown, and as an idea. We believe that in order for our community to thrive, we need diversity in tax revenue, diversity in professions, and diversity in people. We believe that creating a welcoming atmosphere for families needs to be balanced with creating a welcoming atmosphere for business.
We also believe in the American system of democracy. That system says that citizens are the government, and those we elect we elect not only to lead us, but to express our will. They serve us, not vice versa. A parent tells their children what is best for them, to stop whining and eat their vegetables because they said so. Government is not our parents. The village trustees are elected to serve.
Columnist Eric Schelkopf has been hysterical in his belief that North Aurora is not the residents, but rather the government. He obviously does not believe that North Aurorans are smart enough to govern themselves, but rather should hand over their sovereignty to their elected officials and their pals in the business community—the nanny government described above. Masquerading as a journalist, Mr. Schelkopf has mocked our efforts to protect our community character and become civically engaged. At every turn he has accused us of selfishness, inconsistency, hypocrisy, fear-mongering, and foolishness. It is Mr. Schelkopf’s belief that government is not meant to serve the people, but rather to tell us what to do and what to believe.
“You need a 24-Hour, 200,000+ square foot Supercenter in the middle of a family neighborhood,” they tell us, and we’re supposed to nod and accept it. Exercising our constitutional right to assemble, to petition the government, and to express our opinion is mocked and belittled by Mr. Schelkopf and, shockingly, Village President John Hansen as well as Trustee Linda Mitchell, who have tut-tutted the recent, righteous decision by the board to reject an annexation agreement that would have allowed Wal-Mart to build an obtrusive Supercenter in the middle of a residential community near two schools.
“What happened to free enterprise?” Mr. Schelkopf asked us in a series of increasingly hostile e-mails. It’s a good question. What happened to free enterprise, when the largest retailer on planet Earth comes to North Aurora residents and demands a series of economic incentives, outlined in an economic incentive agreement, amounting to welfare? Where was Schelkopf’s strident editorial defending the people? Where is Schelkopf’s investigative unbiased reporting?
His snide commentary that those of us who live on the west side of town made a critical mistake in moving near a “vacant lot,” is laughable besides being intellectually dishonest. You can move next to a fully operational, friendly neighborhood strip mall and it can be sold to a big box retailer, up-zoned, granted Special Use permits, and voila, you have a “mega retailer” right next door. And should the neighbors and community raise a stink, they can count on Eric Schelkopf and the Kane County Chronicle, to bash them for NIMBYism, or closet socialism, or whatever panicky epithet they may come up with. I guess he would tell those people not to be so foolish to move somewhere where businesses may want to locate nearby. One wonders how much glee Mr. Schelkopf would have had in mocking the victims of the Bhopal chemical spill disaster for moving near a Union Carbide facility.
Communities have every right to restrict the type, size, and character of businesses moving into their town. They do it all the time. Whether it be limiting adult services, alcohol or firearms sales, drive-thrus, or auto-mechanics; they limit multi-unit and single-unit dwellings, and even, in some cases, the ages of potential homeowners. And what are “communities”—towns, villages, cities—if not the residents and property owners?
North Aurora’s Board of Trustees, with notable exceptions, was brave and righteous in expressing the will of the people and defending North Aurora’s character and values. Perhaps one day, Mr. Schelkopf’s ideal of a society of subservient, obedient yokels on their knees pleading for some scraps of tax revenue will come true; until then, North Aurora Together will continue to fight to express the will of the people.
We believe in America and the American system of free enterprise and property rights. We believe in North Aurora as a community, as a hometown, and as an idea. We believe that in order for our community to thrive, we need diversity in tax revenue, diversity in professions, and diversity in people. We believe that creating a welcoming atmosphere for families needs to be balanced with creating a welcoming atmosphere for business.
We also believe in the American system of democracy. That system says that citizens are the government, and those we elect we elect not only to lead us, but to express our will. They serve us, not vice versa. A parent tells their children what is best for them, to stop whining and eat their vegetables because they said so. Government is not our parents. The village trustees are elected to serve.
Columnist Eric Schelkopf has been hysterical in his belief that North Aurora is not the residents, but rather the government. He obviously does not believe that North Aurorans are smart enough to govern themselves, but rather should hand over their sovereignty to their elected officials and their pals in the business community—the nanny government described above. Masquerading as a journalist, Mr. Schelkopf has mocked our efforts to protect our community character and become civically engaged. At every turn he has accused us of selfishness, inconsistency, hypocrisy, fear-mongering, and foolishness. It is Mr. Schelkopf’s belief that government is not meant to serve the people, but rather to tell us what to do and what to believe.
“You need a 24-Hour, 200,000+ square foot Supercenter in the middle of a family neighborhood,” they tell us, and we’re supposed to nod and accept it. Exercising our constitutional right to assemble, to petition the government, and to express our opinion is mocked and belittled by Mr. Schelkopf and, shockingly, Village President John Hansen as well as Trustee Linda Mitchell, who have tut-tutted the recent, righteous decision by the board to reject an annexation agreement that would have allowed Wal-Mart to build an obtrusive Supercenter in the middle of a residential community near two schools.
“What happened to free enterprise?” Mr. Schelkopf asked us in a series of increasingly hostile e-mails. It’s a good question. What happened to free enterprise, when the largest retailer on planet Earth comes to North Aurora residents and demands a series of economic incentives, outlined in an economic incentive agreement, amounting to welfare? Where was Schelkopf’s strident editorial defending the people? Where is Schelkopf’s investigative unbiased reporting?
His snide commentary that those of us who live on the west side of town made a critical mistake in moving near a “vacant lot,” is laughable besides being intellectually dishonest. You can move next to a fully operational, friendly neighborhood strip mall and it can be sold to a big box retailer, up-zoned, granted Special Use permits, and voila, you have a “mega retailer” right next door. And should the neighbors and community raise a stink, they can count on Eric Schelkopf and the Kane County Chronicle, to bash them for NIMBYism, or closet socialism, or whatever panicky epithet they may come up with. I guess he would tell those people not to be so foolish to move somewhere where businesses may want to locate nearby. One wonders how much glee Mr. Schelkopf would have had in mocking the victims of the Bhopal chemical spill disaster for moving near a Union Carbide facility.
Communities have every right to restrict the type, size, and character of businesses moving into their town. They do it all the time. Whether it be limiting adult services, alcohol or firearms sales, drive-thrus, or auto-mechanics; they limit multi-unit and single-unit dwellings, and even, in some cases, the ages of potential homeowners. And what are “communities”—towns, villages, cities—if not the residents and property owners?
North Aurora’s Board of Trustees, with notable exceptions, was brave and righteous in expressing the will of the people and defending North Aurora’s character and values. Perhaps one day, Mr. Schelkopf’s ideal of a society of subservient, obedient yokels on their knees pleading for some scraps of tax revenue will come true; until then, North Aurora Together will continue to fight to express the will of the people.
Monday, June 25, 2007
C.O.P. Bytes Information
C.O.P.BYTES is a public service of the North Aurora Police Department. If you wish to subscribe to C.O.P.BYTES - please send an e-mail to rstecklein@vil.north-aurora.il.us. Please include the area where you live or business you represent.
Wednesday, June 20, 2007
Friday, June 1, 2007
Sunday, May 27, 2007
Monday, May 21, 2007
Monday, May 14, 2007
Wednesday, May 9, 2007
More Victory Articles!
Beacon News :: News :: N. Aurora nixes new Wal-Mart
Daily Herald Kane County Wal-Mart Wanted Tax Incentives
Kane County Chronicle - Local News and Video for Kane County, Illinois - Wal-Mart evaluates next move. Please click on the comments link under the article on the Chronicle web site to read a comment that was left by a supporter of Wal-Mart.
After Wal-Mart Vote, N. Aurora Faces Tought Task (Beacon)
Daily Herald Kane County Wal-Mart Wanted Tax Incentives
Kane County Chronicle - Local News and Video for Kane County, Illinois - Wal-Mart evaluates next move. Please click on the comments link under the article on the Chronicle web site to read a comment that was left by a supporter of Wal-Mart.
After Wal-Mart Vote, N. Aurora Faces Tought Task (Beacon)
Tuesday, May 8, 2007
North Aurora Rejects Wal-Mart Plan
Here are a couple of links that will take you to articles in the paper that cover our Victory!
North Aurora Rejects Wal-Mart Plan (Daily Herald)
North Aurora Rejects Wal-Mart (Chronicle - See comments)
North Aurora Rejects Wal-Mart Plan (Daily Herald)
North Aurora Rejects Wal-Mart (Chronicle - See comments)
VICTORY!
With a vote of 5-1 (against), the trustees have made it clear that Wal-Mart will not be built on the northeast corner of Oak St. and Orchard Rd. in North Aurora! Several trustees stated that it is not the right location for Wal-Mart. The vote took place close to midnight on May 7, 2007.
Thank you to the trustees for listening to the residents concerns and pleas. Now we need to work on bringing the type of development North Aurora residents would like to see on that corner.
Thank you to everyone for supporting North Aurora Together! It really does take the whole community coming together to make a difference.
The votes were as follows:
Berman - NO
Herlihy - NO
Gaffino - NO
Herwig - NO
Shoemaker - NO
Mitchell - YES
Thank you to the trustees for listening to the residents concerns and pleas. Now we need to work on bringing the type of development North Aurora residents would like to see on that corner.
Thank you to everyone for supporting North Aurora Together! It really does take the whole community coming together to make a difference.
The votes were as follows:
Berman - NO
Herlihy - NO
Gaffino - NO
Herwig - NO
Shoemaker - NO
Mitchell - YES
Sunday, May 6, 2007
Village Meeting Monday, May 7 @ 7:00PM
On Monday, May 7, North Aurora could change forever! Monday is the continuation of the public hearing on the proposed 24-Hour Super Wal-Mart. Last Friday afternoon, the village posted a special village board meeting on the agenda after the committee of the whole meeting so that the trustees can take a vote on the proposal.
Please come out and show your support!
Please come out and show your support!
Thursday, May 3, 2007
Picket On Saturday, May 5 from 1:00 - 3:00
Come out and join your neighbors in a rally against Super Wal-Mart on the corner of Oak St. and Orchard Rd. on Saturday, May 5 at Oak St. and Forest Ridge Dr. on the sidewalk in front of the townhouses from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. This is our last chance to make a big impression before the public hearing on Monday, May 7 at 7:00 p.m.Together, We Can Make A Difference!
Monday, April 30, 2007
Movie Night - Thursday, May 3 @ 7:00 PM
Come out and join your fellow members to watch WAL-MART: THE HIGH COST OF LOW PRICE. We will watch the film at Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 501, 1295 Butterfield Rd., Aurora. It's 98 minutes long. Bring your own popcorn!
For more info. click on the following link. WAL-MART: The High Cost of Low Price
About the film
WAL-MART: THE HIGH COST OF LOW PRICE is a feature length documentary that uncovers a retail giant's assault on families and American values. The film dives into the deeply personal stories and everyday lives of families and communities struggling to fight a goliath. A working mother is forced to turn to public assistance to provide healthcare for her two small children. A Missouri family loses its business after Wal-Mart is given over $2 million to open its doors down the road. A mayor struggles to equip his first responders after Wal-Mart pulls out and relocates just outside the city limits. A community in California unites, takes on the giant, and wins!
Producer/Director Robert Greenwald and Brave New Films take you on an extraordinary journey that will change the way you think, feel -- and shop.
Read more in the director's introduction »
Running time: 98 Minutes
Released in theaters: November 4th, 2005
For more info. click on the following link. WAL-MART: The High Cost of Low Price
About the film
WAL-MART: THE HIGH COST OF LOW PRICE is a feature length documentary that uncovers a retail giant's assault on families and American values. The film dives into the deeply personal stories and everyday lives of families and communities struggling to fight a goliath. A working mother is forced to turn to public assistance to provide healthcare for her two small children. A Missouri family loses its business after Wal-Mart is given over $2 million to open its doors down the road. A mayor struggles to equip his first responders after Wal-Mart pulls out and relocates just outside the city limits. A community in California unites, takes on the giant, and wins!
Producer/Director Robert Greenwald and Brave New Films take you on an extraordinary journey that will change the way you think, feel -- and shop.
Read more in the director's introduction »
Running time: 98 Minutes
Released in theaters: November 4th, 2005
Saturday, April 28, 2007
Picket Today, Saturday, April 28!
Today from 1-3 will be our second picket on the bridge in North Aurora. Come on out for some fresh air and exercise and show your support! I have a few signs if you don't have time to make one.
Saturday, April 21, 2007
St. Charles Wins Their Battle With A Super Wal-Mart
Kane County Chronicle 4/17/07
STC to use eminent domain in move to build east-side road
By KELLEY CASINO - kcasino@kcchronicle.com
ST. CHARLES – The city will seize the land necessary to build a road on the city’s east side,though the move will halt plans to build a Wal-Mart Supercenter there. City officials on Monday voted, 7-3, to use eminent domain to acquire 2.88 acres of land for the road, which would connect Foxfield Drive and Smith Road. The road would bisect a 30-acre parcel where Wal-Mart is looking to build a more than 200,000-square-foot store. “It gives me the marching orders to file a complaint for eminent domain,” city attorney Phil Luetkehans said of Monday’s vote. A complaint will be filed in Kane County Circuit Court in the next two weeks, he said. Negotiations with the title holder of record – West Suburban Bank – began in February and were unsuccessful, city officials said. “We’ve reached an impasse in negotiations and were unable to reach a negotiated purchase price,” Luetkehans said. “We received a letter saying they were not interested in selling the property.” Land owners were not immediately available for comment, and Luetkehans said it was not made clear why the land owner was not interested in selling.Legally, governments are allowed to seize private property for public benefit with fair compensation. Once a complaint requesting eminent domain is filed, the case will go to trial for a judge or jury to set a price for the land, Luetkehans said. The average condemnation, or eminent domain, case takes 18 months to three years to complete, Luetkehans said. Either side can appeal a decision. Several aldermen voted against the use of eminent domain, citing timing and economics, among other reasons. “I think it’s going to cost us a lot more money than we think it will,” said 3rd Ward Alderman William Turner. “I think we’re trying in a way to get around an annexation agreement and a [planned unit development], both of which have the force of the law.” First Ward Alderman Ron Silkaitis said he was not comfortable with court rulings on condemnation. “We have a legal basis to do it,” he said. “That doesn’t mean we have to do it.”Third Ward Alderman John McGuirk said he, too, did not believe that the city had the money to buy the land and pay for legal fees.Developers of the proposed Wal-Mart recently revised their plans in an effort to be more responsive to resident concerns about traffic and noise. An outdoor garden center, a drive-through pharmacy, and a tire and lube exchange were removed from the plans, providing for a greater set-back and more buffering. City officials have said the purpose of the road was not to halt the construction of the supercenter but to increase traffic circulation. “The city has envisioned for many years a road that goes between Foxfield and Smith Road,” said 2nd Ward Alderman Cliff Carrignan. “I think the city council made a decision tonight that says that road is necessary for the community.”
STC to use eminent domain in move to build east-side road
By KELLEY CASINO - kcasino@kcchronicle.com
ST. CHARLES – The city will seize the land necessary to build a road on the city’s east side,though the move will halt plans to build a Wal-Mart Supercenter there. City officials on Monday voted, 7-3, to use eminent domain to acquire 2.88 acres of land for the road, which would connect Foxfield Drive and Smith Road. The road would bisect a 30-acre parcel where Wal-Mart is looking to build a more than 200,000-square-foot store. “It gives me the marching orders to file a complaint for eminent domain,” city attorney Phil Luetkehans said of Monday’s vote. A complaint will be filed in Kane County Circuit Court in the next two weeks, he said. Negotiations with the title holder of record – West Suburban Bank – began in February and were unsuccessful, city officials said. “We’ve reached an impasse in negotiations and were unable to reach a negotiated purchase price,” Luetkehans said. “We received a letter saying they were not interested in selling the property.” Land owners were not immediately available for comment, and Luetkehans said it was not made clear why the land owner was not interested in selling.Legally, governments are allowed to seize private property for public benefit with fair compensation. Once a complaint requesting eminent domain is filed, the case will go to trial for a judge or jury to set a price for the land, Luetkehans said. The average condemnation, or eminent domain, case takes 18 months to three years to complete, Luetkehans said. Either side can appeal a decision. Several aldermen voted against the use of eminent domain, citing timing and economics, among other reasons. “I think it’s going to cost us a lot more money than we think it will,” said 3rd Ward Alderman William Turner. “I think we’re trying in a way to get around an annexation agreement and a [planned unit development], both of which have the force of the law.” First Ward Alderman Ron Silkaitis said he was not comfortable with court rulings on condemnation. “We have a legal basis to do it,” he said. “That doesn’t mean we have to do it.”Third Ward Alderman John McGuirk said he, too, did not believe that the city had the money to buy the land and pay for legal fees.Developers of the proposed Wal-Mart recently revised their plans in an effort to be more responsive to resident concerns about traffic and noise. An outdoor garden center, a drive-through pharmacy, and a tire and lube exchange were removed from the plans, providing for a greater set-back and more buffering. City officials have said the purpose of the road was not to halt the construction of the supercenter but to increase traffic circulation. “The city has envisioned for many years a road that goes between Foxfield and Smith Road,” said 2nd Ward Alderman Cliff Carrignan. “I think the city council made a decision tonight that says that road is necessary for the community.”
Wednesday, April 18, 2007
Election Results
Current as of 4/17/2007 10:16:11 PM
VILLAGE OF NORTH AURORA
FOR VILLAGE TRUSTEE (Vote for 3)
Precincts Reporting
10 of 10
Registered Voters 9000
Ballots Cast 2306
Turnout 25.62%
.................................Votes..................... % of Votes
Robert Strusz ................1592.................. 23.01%
Michael Herlihy III...........1278.................. 18.47%
Dale Berman ...................1400................. 20.24%
Tanya Berley....................1257....................18.17%
VILLAGE OF NORTH AURORA
FOR VILLAGE TRUSTEE (Vote for 3)
Precincts Reporting
10 of 10
Registered Voters 9000
Ballots Cast 2306
Turnout 25.62%
.................................Votes..................... % of Votes
Robert Strusz ................1592.................. 23.01%
Michael Herlihy III...........1278.................. 18.47%
Dale Berman ...................1400................. 20.24%
Tanya Berley....................1257....................18.17%
Tuesday, April 17, 2007
Intervention Needed at Village Hall
Last evening at the Joint Plan Commission and Committee of the Whole meeting, Special Assistant State's Attorney Ken Shepro was hired to come in and give a "pep talk" and to discuss what should have been handled differently to keep the strife from this process stated as he closed, That Wal-Mart is not a done deal until the President's gavel hits the bench! This can only give us the idea of the controversy still at hand. The Planning Commission is very upset because they were not informed of pertinent information about the Wal-Mart proposal, just as the residents of the Village of North Aurora were not informed.
If you think that your opinion doesn't matter, think again. We are the residents that make up this great community. And, if we all pull together, we can make a difference!! Our efforts are working!
Please continue to make phone calls to the trustees and send them e-mails over any concerns you have about this Wal-Mart proposal. We need to remind them that we are not going to forget about this proposal until the gavel hits the bench!
If you think that your opinion doesn't matter, think again. We are the residents that make up this great community. And, if we all pull together, we can make a difference!! Our efforts are working!
Please continue to make phone calls to the trustees and send them e-mails over any concerns you have about this Wal-Mart proposal. We need to remind them that we are not going to forget about this proposal until the gavel hits the bench!
Monday, April 16, 2007
Village Elections on April 17, 2007
Get out and Vote!
There are four people running for Village Board Trustee (need to elect three), and they are as follows:
ROBERT STRUSZ
DALE BERMAN
MICHAEL HERLIHY III
TANYA BERLEY
For Village Clerk there is one opening and one person running;
LORI MURRAY
Please contact Village Hall at (630) 897-8228 for more information.
There are four people running for Village Board Trustee (need to elect three), and they are as follows:
ROBERT STRUSZ
DALE BERMAN
MICHAEL HERLIHY III
TANYA BERLEY
For Village Clerk there is one opening and one person running;
LORI MURRAY
Please contact Village Hall at (630) 897-8228 for more information.
Village Elections on April 17, 2007
Get out and Vote!
There are four people running for Village Board Trustee (need to elect three), and they are as follows:
ROBERT STRUSZ
DALE BERMAN
MICHAEL HERLIHY III
TANYA BERLEY
For Village Clerk there is one opening and one person running;
LORI MURRAY
Please contact Village Hall at (630) 897-8228 for more information.
There are four people running for Village Board Trustee (need to elect three), and they are as follows:
ROBERT STRUSZ
DALE BERMAN
MICHAEL HERLIHY III
TANYA BERLEY
For Village Clerk there is one opening and one person running;
LORI MURRAY
Please contact Village Hall at (630) 897-8228 for more information.
Thursday, April 12, 2007
What Is Their Position?
With the election just around the corner, the following questionnaire was sent out to the two candidates, Bob Strusz and Tanya Berley, and to the trustees. Dale Berman and Mike Herlihey are up for reelection. There are four people running and only three seats available. One of our members interviewed Tanya before the questionnaire went out, so she has a N/A next to the questions we did not ask her. As the answers come in, I will post them.
The new trustee's elected next Tuesday will not be able to vote on May 7 at the next Village meeting. They have to wait 30 days and there has to be some sort of affirmation of the vote, or the opportunity for a challenge if the count is close.
I hope that this helps you make an informed decision on how you vote on Tuesday, April 17. Get out and vote!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To All Trustees and Candidates;
North Aurora Together is a group of concerned North Aurora citizens. We aim to keep all North Aurorans informed about issues that will affect them. Therefore, we would like to ask you to answer the below questionnaire before the election on April 17th.
1. Currently, a 24-Hour Wal-Mart Supercenter is planned for the northeast corner of Oak and Orchard Roads. Since the public was not presented with the changes to the plan at the last meeting, can you tell us what changes have been made?
Dale Berman - The major proposed change that I see is the auto service center has been deleted. The garden sales area is to be on the east side.The lighting on the east is to be ballard type lights on top of the retaining wall, lower than the berm and fence. The 1st taller lights are planned for the parking lot about 100 ft. from the lot line. Draining of the berm is improved and erosion control is to be completed as the earth is moved.The retaining wall is to be 45.5 ft. from the lot line. The berm is to be approx. 8 ft. tall and a 8 ft. screening fence on top. Ever-greens (estimated 15 ft. high in 5 years) are also planned on top of the berm.
None of these proposed changes have been discussed with staff or village board.
Tanya Berley - (N/A)
Bob Strusz - I have been given no information on what Wal-Mart has changed. This info has been left out of my packets of information. I to have heard about the removal of the mechanics garage. And a possible change in the color of the building. I was not happy that Wal-Mart did not go ahead at the last meeting and advise us on what changes have been made. I think that should have been disclosed to the public.
Mark Gaffino - I was disappointed that Walmart did not present there newest model. Not sure why?? I did see that they eliminated the mechanics garage, change color of the facade. However, I suppose this could change again,until we see a final on this.
Max Herwing - The package I received last Thursday afternoon for the Monday night meeting had the following changes, that I could tell were different than what I had before: The tire shop was eliminated and the colors of the building were changed. Until Wal-Mart gives their presentation, I won't really know what else changed. The packet of information we received at Monday nights meeting contained the incentive agreement details, which I have not read all the way through yet so I cannot comment on.
2. With the understanding that many North Aurorans consider this an issue of vital importance, and also with consideration for the fact that some changes may be made to the proposal, if the vote were to be held today, how would you vote be on this proposal as is?
Dale Berman - I would vote NO. Against the proposal.
Tanya Berley - I agree that there are too many Wal-marts within such a small radius and that Oak and Randall would not be a good place where it would affect the residents there. If it were to go up, it belongs therein the area where Target is.
Bob Strusz - I have been back and fourth on this for the last 2 weeks. The night the Planning Commission went through this was a very long and trying night. I think that if given more time to go over these plans that some of the commission would have voted in different ways. That's my opinion. Although I was one of 6 member that did pass this on to the trustees with the 16 conditions that we would like changed. Now that I have had weeks to look at things from different perspectives it has given me some different views of things. I am not against Wal-Mart coming to N.Aurora. But I do not support the Wal-mart on that corner. I do not know what incentives they are proposing to give Wal-Mart but that may change my mine on Wal-Mart all together. I would like to see it over by the other big box stores. During the meeting Monday Night some one had said that maybe North Aurora is not a Wal-mart community. That may be the simple facts.
Mark Gaffino - I have not made up my mind yet.....I do like all the input and energy you and the group are doing.
Max Herwig - I am not in a position to give an answer at this time because I have not had a chance to hear the other 5 trustees position on the subject. I usually like to hear what the other trustees have to say in regards to any issue specially one of this magnitude
3. Currently, the Comprehensive Plan calls for that parcel to be used commercially. Understanding that a residential and commercial harmony is a cornerstone of a sustainable and attractive community, what would your ideal tenant be for that parcel?
Dale Berman - In our comprehensive plan this parcel is B 2. Any business that is a permitted use under our zoning ordinance can locate there. 1st come 1st served. The owner of the land is really in control.
Tanya Berley - I would rather like to see something like a COSTCO ..... where they pay a better wage; or something very unique in this area. And then again can our population of 15,000 + attract that kind of businesssuch as a Red Lobster? We need things where there is not such a high saturation of . Something that the surrounding areas do not have that would attract people.
Bob Strusz - Not the location for Wal-Mart, however I would like to see a strip mall with specialty stores or other retail stores that are not big box, perhaps cafe's like Starbucks Coffee,
Panara Bread or even a Applebee's.
Mark Gaffino - I would like to see a mixed use of retail and restaurants. Possibly more of an up scale type center. I feel we need some higher end stores, With possibly up type restaurants, specialty stores. I believe it all needs to work in harmony with each other and the residential areas also. Very important.
Max Herwig - That corner has been planned for many years to be a big box retailer. We purposely buffered that corner with town homes to the east so that the single-family homes were not affected by the corner development. Town homes are used in many communities to buffer single family residential from commercial developments. If the Wal-Mart store is not approved for that corner than I’d like to see the developer, LFI, try to bring in a Costco, Borders, or Barns & Nobel, something of that type. If the developer decides to put in a strip mall, I’d like to see some decent restaurants, boutiques, card shops, maybe a specialty shop etc.
4. How do you foresee the impact that the future growth of retail will make on the North Aurora residential community on the far West Side?
Dale Berman - I feel that your planning commission and village board has done a complete job with our comprehensive plan. We have used the best planning consultants and engineers available.They have worked with us for many years and feel as strongly about North Aurora's future as any one else. The village has been planned with a balanced mix of homes, multi family, office-research, industrial and commercial-retail areas.There are lot sizes from 8,000 to 14,000 and homes at all value levels. The majority of our homes are built or planned and will now support the commercial-retail that is coming.
Tanya Berley - (N/A)
Bob Strusz - Further growth is going to happen no matter what, so I believe we should be very careful on how we proceed with development on the West side. Sometimes its best to weigh out all options before giving in to the big developers. In other words we hold the cards, and there fro we should choose what's best for our village not the developers.
Mark Gaffino - (Did not answer.)
Max Herwig - I’m not sure how you define far west side. Is that Tanner Trails? Our current commercial area is along the Randall road/Oak Street, Oak/Orchard road and Orchard/Randall corridor. The property that is currently not annexed into North Aurora on the southwest corner of Deerpath and Tanner is single family residential on our comp plan. Depending upon the type of commercial that comes in, it should have a very positive impact to the residential community. I would like to think that the commercial growth that we have had so far has had a positive impact on the residents on the west, far west side as well as the east side. There are a large number of out-lots at the shopping center and Woodman’s that have not been developed yet that hopefully will bring retail to North Aurora as well.
5. What do you believe is the number one issue facing North Aurora?
Dale Berman - To continue our planned growth and maintain our streets, water and services without increases in property taxes.
Tanya Berley - (N/A)
Bob Strusz - Commercial , retail growth,infrastructure improvements and the Route 31 corridor. Route 31 is our ticket to improving the appeal of our Village, it is the gate way to our town. I will consider it one of my top priorities to work with the other trustees and staff to be
something done on Route 31.
Mark Gaffino - Growth/retail-commercial and residential. We need controlled growth , with a lot of thought put into it, more community input. Maybe a committee can come out of this issue now.
Max Herwig - Growth with a capital G. We are growing and with growth come all kinds of issues, such as infrastructure, which includes water, roads, sidewalks and new police station. Providing the growing community with what they need in parks, community center, etc.
COMMENTS
Dale Berman - Thank you for the opportunity to answer your questions as I understand them. My efforts are to do the best I can for North Aurora. I understand the concerns you have and feel that you have done a good job of getting your points across, logically and most importantly unemotionally.
Mark Gaffino - I do appreciate the input and thoughts. I lived in North Aurora my entire life. I would not live anywhere else, With that said ,you can guarantee that I will look out for all the citizens best interest and the town itself. It is very special place for me and my family.
The new trustee's elected next Tuesday will not be able to vote on May 7 at the next Village meeting. They have to wait 30 days and there has to be some sort of affirmation of the vote, or the opportunity for a challenge if the count is close.
I hope that this helps you make an informed decision on how you vote on Tuesday, April 17. Get out and vote!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
To All Trustees and Candidates;
North Aurora Together is a group of concerned North Aurora citizens. We aim to keep all North Aurorans informed about issues that will affect them. Therefore, we would like to ask you to answer the below questionnaire before the election on April 17th.
1. Currently, a 24-Hour Wal-Mart Supercenter is planned for the northeast corner of Oak and Orchard Roads. Since the public was not presented with the changes to the plan at the last meeting, can you tell us what changes have been made?
Dale Berman - The major proposed change that I see is the auto service center has been deleted. The garden sales area is to be on the east side.The lighting on the east is to be ballard type lights on top of the retaining wall, lower than the berm and fence. The 1st taller lights are planned for the parking lot about 100 ft. from the lot line. Draining of the berm is improved and erosion control is to be completed as the earth is moved.The retaining wall is to be 45.5 ft. from the lot line. The berm is to be approx. 8 ft. tall and a 8 ft. screening fence on top. Ever-greens (estimated 15 ft. high in 5 years) are also planned on top of the berm.
None of these proposed changes have been discussed with staff or village board.
Tanya Berley - (N/A)
Bob Strusz - I have been given no information on what Wal-Mart has changed. This info has been left out of my packets of information. I to have heard about the removal of the mechanics garage. And a possible change in the color of the building. I was not happy that Wal-Mart did not go ahead at the last meeting and advise us on what changes have been made. I think that should have been disclosed to the public.
Mark Gaffino - I was disappointed that Walmart did not present there newest model. Not sure why?? I did see that they eliminated the mechanics garage, change color of the facade. However, I suppose this could change again,until we see a final on this.
Max Herwing - The package I received last Thursday afternoon for the Monday night meeting had the following changes, that I could tell were different than what I had before: The tire shop was eliminated and the colors of the building were changed. Until Wal-Mart gives their presentation, I won't really know what else changed. The packet of information we received at Monday nights meeting contained the incentive agreement details, which I have not read all the way through yet so I cannot comment on.
2. With the understanding that many North Aurorans consider this an issue of vital importance, and also with consideration for the fact that some changes may be made to the proposal, if the vote were to be held today, how would you vote be on this proposal as is?
Dale Berman - I would vote NO. Against the proposal.
Tanya Berley - I agree that there are too many Wal-marts within such a small radius and that Oak and Randall would not be a good place where it would affect the residents there. If it were to go up, it belongs therein the area where Target is.
Bob Strusz - I have been back and fourth on this for the last 2 weeks. The night the Planning Commission went through this was a very long and trying night. I think that if given more time to go over these plans that some of the commission would have voted in different ways. That's my opinion. Although I was one of 6 member that did pass this on to the trustees with the 16 conditions that we would like changed. Now that I have had weeks to look at things from different perspectives it has given me some different views of things. I am not against Wal-Mart coming to N.Aurora. But I do not support the Wal-mart on that corner. I do not know what incentives they are proposing to give Wal-Mart but that may change my mine on Wal-Mart all together. I would like to see it over by the other big box stores. During the meeting Monday Night some one had said that maybe North Aurora is not a Wal-mart community. That may be the simple facts.
Mark Gaffino - I have not made up my mind yet.....I do like all the input and energy you and the group are doing.
Max Herwig - I am not in a position to give an answer at this time because I have not had a chance to hear the other 5 trustees position on the subject. I usually like to hear what the other trustees have to say in regards to any issue specially one of this magnitude
3. Currently, the Comprehensive Plan calls for that parcel to be used commercially. Understanding that a residential and commercial harmony is a cornerstone of a sustainable and attractive community, what would your ideal tenant be for that parcel?
Dale Berman - In our comprehensive plan this parcel is B 2. Any business that is a permitted use under our zoning ordinance can locate there. 1st come 1st served. The owner of the land is really in control.
Tanya Berley - I would rather like to see something like a COSTCO ..... where they pay a better wage; or something very unique in this area. And then again can our population of 15,000 + attract that kind of businesssuch as a Red Lobster? We need things where there is not such a high saturation of . Something that the surrounding areas do not have that would attract people.
Bob Strusz - Not the location for Wal-Mart, however I would like to see a strip mall with specialty stores or other retail stores that are not big box, perhaps cafe's like Starbucks Coffee,
Panara Bread or even a Applebee's.
Mark Gaffino - I would like to see a mixed use of retail and restaurants. Possibly more of an up scale type center. I feel we need some higher end stores, With possibly up type restaurants, specialty stores. I believe it all needs to work in harmony with each other and the residential areas also. Very important.
Max Herwig - That corner has been planned for many years to be a big box retailer. We purposely buffered that corner with town homes to the east so that the single-family homes were not affected by the corner development. Town homes are used in many communities to buffer single family residential from commercial developments. If the Wal-Mart store is not approved for that corner than I’d like to see the developer, LFI, try to bring in a Costco, Borders, or Barns & Nobel, something of that type. If the developer decides to put in a strip mall, I’d like to see some decent restaurants, boutiques, card shops, maybe a specialty shop etc.
4. How do you foresee the impact that the future growth of retail will make on the North Aurora residential community on the far West Side?
Dale Berman - I feel that your planning commission and village board has done a complete job with our comprehensive plan. We have used the best planning consultants and engineers available.They have worked with us for many years and feel as strongly about North Aurora's future as any one else. The village has been planned with a balanced mix of homes, multi family, office-research, industrial and commercial-retail areas.There are lot sizes from 8,000 to 14,000 and homes at all value levels. The majority of our homes are built or planned and will now support the commercial-retail that is coming.
Tanya Berley - (N/A)
Bob Strusz - Further growth is going to happen no matter what, so I believe we should be very careful on how we proceed with development on the West side. Sometimes its best to weigh out all options before giving in to the big developers. In other words we hold the cards, and there fro we should choose what's best for our village not the developers.
Mark Gaffino - (Did not answer.)
Max Herwig - I’m not sure how you define far west side. Is that Tanner Trails? Our current commercial area is along the Randall road/Oak Street, Oak/Orchard road and Orchard/Randall corridor. The property that is currently not annexed into North Aurora on the southwest corner of Deerpath and Tanner is single family residential on our comp plan. Depending upon the type of commercial that comes in, it should have a very positive impact to the residential community. I would like to think that the commercial growth that we have had so far has had a positive impact on the residents on the west, far west side as well as the east side. There are a large number of out-lots at the shopping center and Woodman’s that have not been developed yet that hopefully will bring retail to North Aurora as well.
5. What do you believe is the number one issue facing North Aurora?
Dale Berman - To continue our planned growth and maintain our streets, water and services without increases in property taxes.
Tanya Berley - (N/A)
Bob Strusz - Commercial , retail growth,infrastructure improvements and the Route 31 corridor. Route 31 is our ticket to improving the appeal of our Village, it is the gate way to our town. I will consider it one of my top priorities to work with the other trustees and staff to be
something done on Route 31.
Mark Gaffino - Growth/retail-commercial and residential. We need controlled growth , with a lot of thought put into it, more community input. Maybe a committee can come out of this issue now.
Max Herwig - Growth with a capital G. We are growing and with growth come all kinds of issues, such as infrastructure, which includes water, roads, sidewalks and new police station. Providing the growing community with what they need in parks, community center, etc.
COMMENTS
Dale Berman - Thank you for the opportunity to answer your questions as I understand them. My efforts are to do the best I can for North Aurora. I understand the concerns you have and feel that you have done a good job of getting your points across, logically and most importantly unemotionally.
Mark Gaffino - I do appreciate the input and thoughts. I lived in North Aurora my entire life. I would not live anywhere else, With that said ,you can guarantee that I will look out for all the citizens best interest and the town itself. It is very special place for me and my family.
Monday, April 9, 2007
Vote Postponed Until May 7 at 7:00 p.m.
THANK YOU to everyone who came out to the Village Meeting this evening. We certainly filled up the meeting room and our presence was noticed. I would also like to thank everyone who spoke before the Board. Everyone was very respectful and that is how we will be heard. The Trustees are listening to our concerns.
The Board has decided to postpone the vote until Monday, May 7 at 7:00 p.m. In the meantime, please continue to send e-mails and make phone calls to our Village Trustees. And don't forget to talk to people in our community about this proposal and have them sign our on-line petition.
Daily Herald Article by John Johnston
Beacon News Article by Erika Wurst
Kane County Chronicle Article by Eric Shelkopf
So what is their position on the proposal?
Hansen - Didn't comment on position. Wants to review more information.
Berman - Has not made up his mind. (Up for re-election)
Gaffino - In the middle of the road.
Herlihy- Has not made up his mind. (Up for re-election)
Mitchell - Has not made up her mind.
Herwig - Did not comment on position.
Shoemaker - Did not comment on position.
Tanya Berley - Unknown. (On the ballot)
Robert Strusz - Unknown. (On the ballot)
The Board has decided to postpone the vote until Monday, May 7 at 7:00 p.m. In the meantime, please continue to send e-mails and make phone calls to our Village Trustees. And don't forget to talk to people in our community about this proposal and have them sign our on-line petition.
Daily Herald Article by John Johnston
Beacon News Article by Erika Wurst
Kane County Chronicle Article by Eric Shelkopf
So what is their position on the proposal?
Hansen - Didn't comment on position. Wants to review more information.
Berman - Has not made up his mind. (Up for re-election)
Gaffino - In the middle of the road.
Herlihy- Has not made up his mind. (Up for re-election)
Mitchell - Has not made up her mind.
Herwig - Did not comment on position.
Shoemaker - Did not comment on position.
Tanya Berley - Unknown. (On the ballot)
Robert Strusz - Unknown. (On the ballot)
Sunday, April 8, 2007
Picket Was A Success
About 14 people showed up on this holiday weekend to help bring awareness of the Wal-Mart proposal to the many people that cross the bridge in North Aurora. The horns were honking and people were giving us a thumbs-up! Thank you to everyone for coming out and showing your support. (In spite of the chilly weather.)
Kane County Chronicle Article by Paul Dailing
Kane County Chronicle Article by Paul Dailing
Saturday, April 7, 2007
Vote Scheduled For Monday, April 9 at 7:00 p.m.
The Village Board will be voting on the proposed Super Wal-Mart development on Monday, April 9 at 7:00 p.m. One piece of advice that our Kane County Board Representative Mr. Bill Wyatt gave us at the meeting last week was that everyone needs to show up at the Village Hall. We need to pack the place! PLEASE DON'T MISS THIS IMPORTANT VOTE! Remember to sign-in if you want to speak and stay to hear the comments from the Trustees.
Do you know 5 people in North Aurora who may not be aware of the proposal? We encourage you to call 5 people who may not be aware of what is going on with this intersection and invite them to attend the meeting on Monday!
Join North Aurora Together: E-mail NorthAuroraTogether@gmail.com
Sign our petition: www.petitionspot.com/petitions/notowalmart
Do You Want a Sign?
I have a few large yard signs available. If you live in a high traffic area or along Oak St., please let me know by sending an e-mail to NorthAuroraTogether@gmail.com with your name and address if you would like a sign for your yard. I will deliver them to you.
Do you know 5 people in North Aurora who may not be aware of the proposal? We encourage you to call 5 people who may not be aware of what is going on with this intersection and invite them to attend the meeting on Monday!
Join North Aurora Together: E-mail NorthAuroraTogether@gmail.com
Sign our petition: www.petitionspot.com/petitions/notowalmart
Do You Want a Sign?
I have a few large yard signs available. If you live in a high traffic area or along Oak St., please let me know by sending an e-mail to NorthAuroraTogether@gmail.com with your name and address if you would like a sign for your yard. I will deliver them to you.
Friday, April 6, 2007
PICKET
There will be a picket on Saturday, April 7 from 1:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m. at the North Aurora bridge. Come out and show your support with your friends and neighbors. Please keep in mind that this will be a peaceful demonstration to boost awareness in our community.
Tuesday, April 3, 2007
14 Days to Election Day!
Countdown to the municipal election:
14 Days
Voting in Municipal elections is your civic duty!
14 Days
Voting in Municipal elections is your civic duty!
Monday, April 2, 2007
Daily Herald Makes North Aurora Endorsements
The Daily Herald has released its endorsements for the Village Board:
Let's see if we can't convince our Trustees otherwise! The 24-Hour Super Wal-Mart proposed for the intersection of Oak and Orchard is not the right choice for North Aurora. There's no doubt the Village could use revenue, but not at the cost a large, big-box development wedged into a space that is ringed by homes and two schools.
Putting a huge retailer of the type like a Wal-Mart Supercenter in the middle of a residential neighborhood will change the character of the Village. Not to mention the degradation of quality of life that hundreds of families will experience.
Let's put our heads together and find a solution!
North Aurora’s growth is similar to what several other towns have experienced along Randall Road.The west side is booming, with residential and retail development. Some major players such as Target, JC Penney and Woodmans have set up shop, with possibly Wal-Mart to follow.
Let's see if we can't convince our Trustees otherwise! The 24-Hour Super Wal-Mart proposed for the intersection of Oak and Orchard is not the right choice for North Aurora. There's no doubt the Village could use revenue, but not at the cost a large, big-box development wedged into a space that is ringed by homes and two schools.
Putting a huge retailer of the type like a Wal-Mart Supercenter in the middle of a residential neighborhood will change the character of the Village. Not to mention the degradation of quality of life that hundreds of families will experience.
Let's put our heads together and find a solution!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
